Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Your session is about to timeout resulting from inactivity. Simply click Okay to increase your time and energy for an additional 0 minutes.Obviously, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of different large amount quantities, but I think I understand why. It's a litigation-pushed world, and a few fool would undoubtedly deduce that he could blend H380 and H110 and think of his have custom blend of powder. What a globe.
You happen to be right They are really the exact same the SC is short Minimize so it meters much better, I do not Imagine you can get just normal 4831 anymore
While using the 154 grain Hornady SP within the 280, H4831 gave me superior teams and superior velocity, but Rottweil R905 contains a considerably increased velocity and supplies marginally much better accuracy. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos within the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave exceptional precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally much better. For that reason, in Every of these cases I went with A different powder, but I would definitely loathe to divest myself in the H4831.
Beginner to reloading. This will probably be used for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I was in the position to get my fingers on a couple lbs of h4831.
Apache Jct Good information, I've jars of equally and constantly puzzled if they may be reloaded Along with the identical recipes must I operate out of 1 or one other.
I am employing it by using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as exact. RL22 did very well but I was slightly concerned about temp balance. I believe I am at seventy two grains and get all around 2850ish fps
Anyhow, I needed to give some 7828SC a try to reduce many of the compression. What a error, I could not get this powder to shoot correctly or create the velocities I get h4831 vs h4831sc with standard 7828.
At this time working with IMR 4831 inside of a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a popular option for this caliber and yields a little bit more velocity. In addition to it being quick Lower, precisely what is the real difference in these two powders, and should h4831sc I switch to H4831sc?
Ballistically, this Serious Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain size, thus, the designation SC or shorter Lower. The shorter, additional compact kernels enable the powder to move through the powder measures a lot more easily, assisting to reduce the frequent chopping of granules.
I wanted a little additional myself so I went forward and grabbed the 8lb jug to become protected for a while (and have loads of precisely the same lot of powder).
The "SC" means Limited Lower. I have not observed a distinction between both powder dut I do not think I'd combine them.
A few of the outdated Lyman data just outlined IMR 4831, which was surplus h4831sc armed service powder and now newer mfg as H4831.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are distinctive. In which there's a chance you're puzzling it and believing that it's near is H4831 and H4831SC are certainly comparable. People two are essentially the identical other than H4831SC is manufactured to lesser grains so it meters less complicated.